The One We Will All Get to Know
from Webster’s Online Dictionary
1 : of, relating to, or favoring blind submission to authority (had authoritarian parents)
2 : of, relating to, or favoring a concentration of power in a leader or an elite not constitutionally responsible to the people (an authoritarian regime)
The personality type is defined by nine traits that were believed to cluster together as the result of psychodynamic, childhood experiences. These traits are:
- authoritarian submission,
- authoritarian aggression,
- anti-intraception (intraception: subjectivity and imagination),
- superstition and stereotypy,
- power and “toughness,”
- destructiveness and cynicism,
- projectivity and ,
- exaggerated concerns over sex.
In brief, the authoritarian is predisposed to follow the dictates of a strong leader and traditional, conventional values.
In Obama’s case, Traditional, Conventional Values would seem to take on aspects of Tribalism (since he seems very connected to the Urbo tribe in Kenya from which his family – in part – arose), and Submission (or being useful to) someone/something whose personality/dictates he perceived stronger than his own. The first trait seems to demonstrate his propensity toward Socialism, as Tribalism is an early form of it.
Some of young Obama’s early years were spent in Kenya with his mom and dad. People there remember him to this day. It was here he saw and learned first-hand about Tribalism and its inner workings – as much as a small child could absorb, at any rate, but something, nonetheless.
The second trait, however, is more troublesome: a predisposition toward Conventional values. For most of us, our values are formed in early childhood when our parents teach us about the world through their eyes, deeds, and words. And because, as children, we were raised in the U.S., we are steeped in America traditions, culture, and values. That same principle holds true for children raised in other countries – their traditions, culture, values. Both here and abroad these thing define – in a child’s mind – conventional values.
And if a child were brought to this country at the age of ten, would not the child’s ‘world-view’ be defined by the sum of all the experiences prior? I ask: how was this different for young Obama? And answer: it was not different, but identical.
After Obama’s mom divorced his father, she married a second Muslim, an Indonesian, and moved with new husband and child to Indonesia. There the young Obama was required by law to attend school: the local Madras. Madrases seldom teach more than the Koran. Even if they do teach more, the emphasis is on the Koran, and that Koranic teaching is always in Arabic – particularly so in a Muslim country like Indonesia. The young Obama would have had to learn Arabic – at least well enough to recite various passages correctly. Does that make him a Muslim?
That point can be argued. However, what cannot be argued is that period steeped young Obama in the Koran and its values. Too many people banter about the word “Islam” without knowing that in Arabic Islam means Submission – total abject submission in all things, in all ways, to the will of Allah. If, for instance, he was caught using a bad word and received punishment from a parent, it was not his parent who caught him, but Allah. It was not his parent punishing him, but Allah. To many Muslims actions and events in the world are totally disassociated from the event – as we in the West would view it. Instead of the event being laid at the feet of the apparent cause, the event belongs to the will of Allah, and nothing can be done to alter it. The Will of Allah is the Will of Allah.
As Dr. Sina points out in the video below one of the traits of a megalomaniac narcissistic personality is a disruptive childhood. Being bounced aroud from country to country, culture to culture, father to father, certainly qualifies as disruptive. Many people undergo something like that in their childhoods. Only a few of those are thankfully prone to be susceptible, and fewer still rise to positions of power. Only a handfull of those rise to power on the world stage, and they are always the authors of national and world tragedies.
I was going to continue with this analysis, but having found Dr, Sina, I think he makes the point more eloquently than I ever could. Moreover, any such paper as this looking to openly at the One, is very risk and potentially dangerous. Oh, not now but after Jan 20th the curve begins to rise steeply. By mid-2009, Obama will make his more to end all dissent when he takes over the FCC. At what point his Civilian National Security Force becomes a reality remains murky. But become a reality they will, and, by then Obama will have had some set backs somewhere, he, like those before him, will find scapegoats to blame. I think his first target, as was others, will be American Jews. His ‘Blue Shirts’ will come for them, and they will be expelled. And that will be the beginning of the rein of the real Obama.
Think I’m the only one raising these points? Check this out:
This video is an introduction to my article Understanding Obama: The Making of a Fuhrer, which is published in faithfreedom.org. It unravels the mystique behind Obamas authoritative and haughty behavior. Obamas charisma is the result of his superiority complex, which is a mask narcissists wear to hide their devalued and injured self. The article draws the similarity that exists between Obama and other famous narcissists such as Hitler, Stalin, Saddam, Khomeini and Osama. It is intended to be a scholarly paper, but alas, in this politically charged atmosphere it is bound to become controversial. – Dr. Ali Sina via www.faithfreedom.org
Does Obama Have Narcissistic Personality Disorder?
As I said elsewhere:
As Obama supporters jump up and down in their glee, as the world sends Obama congratulation in anticipation of achieving goals formerly blocked by previous administrations, some here in the US look on the near future with fear.
We fear because we have seen this face too many times on too many newsreels staring firmly forward, hands raised to form a circle, as vast crowds roar their approval.
We know what those distant crowds heard, what you Obama supporters have either forgotten or never heard:
I will fix your unease. I will fix all your money worries. Together, we will move forward into a new world, a world of renewed hope, of change. All those who stand in our way will be swept aside.
Read The Psychology of Mass Fascism by Wilhelm Reich, M.D. for further insights into the near future, and any good book on the history of WWII for the conclusions.
Meet Obama’s new chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, the enforcer, the new Himmler.
At a dinner to celebrate President Clinton’s first election victory, Mr Emanuel began to name those who he believed had earned his enmity. As he listed the names of those he saw as traitors, he grabbed a steak knife, stood up and began plunging the knife into the table and shouting “Dead! Dead! Dead!” after each name.
“When he was done, the table looked like a lunar landscape,” one witness recalled. “It was like something out of The Godfather. But that’s Rahm for you.”
Nor was this an isolated incident – one pollster who fell out with Mr Emanuel received a rotting fish in the post as a warning not to cross him again.
Time will come when the few Obama supporters who read this post will remember what I and others warned, and some will even have read what I wrote about The Coming Age of Obama and its conclusion. And they will rue the day they praised Obama, wail for the loss of their friends and families, and the countless millions who perished along with their loved ones.
Just a small step from knives in a table to shots in the back of the head – just add in a few too willing Obama admirers. and yesterday’s party traitors become tomorrow’s traitors to the country. Who will be the first to be named and who is willing to be the first to step up to rid the country of traitors?